Causality by Hume and Kant Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Causality by Hume and Kant - Term Paper Example However, if the objects being discussed are appearances, it is safe to say that the regular conjunctions can be improved by combining it with common validity and necessity. This is, so that is perceived as a law, used in appearances, with the objective of potential experience that demands standard and hence necessarily legitimate rules. Considering that the concept of causality is constrained in its relation to experience, Kant required an argument to justify why the universal rules of connection are needed to actualize experience (Ariew & Watkins, 2009, 821). Kant could not contend that these rules are required for the understanding of any one object of appearance. As he (correctly) argued, better than Hume, the causal theory is strictly constraining and not in any way constitutive. As he argued in the prolegomena, he has no understanding of such a link of objects in themselves, how they can function as causes, and he can just conceptualize such attributes in appearances as such. In this context, Hume’s causality argument that one cannot see the power in one object is accurate, even if the object is basically an appearance. Consequently, Kant’s argument’s burden lies in his identifying some aspect of experience that demands that its objects adhere to universal rules linking them with each other (Ariew & Watkins, 2009, 828). Hume surely reasoned that experience is feasible even if objects are simply constantly related but not necessarily linked.